3/29/2024 0 Comments Teracopy vs fastcopyPerformance Counter Robocopy XCopy CPU Usage System 13.65 14.12 Process CPU Usage 51.31 56. 75.28 MB/Sec), the minimum Disk Read Transfer is better for Robocopy (4.74 MB/Sec vs. For me it was simply creating chaos instead of helpingīut the two things I liked about it in it was the fact that separate tasks were now held together and that tasks could be resumed later on, even after the reset. The average Disk Read Transfer is better for XCopy (76.15 MB/Sec vs. It is uninformative, hard to read, buggy, and takes too much space on the screen, obscuring the view. c bit, FastCopy thc hin sao chép d liu không b gián on bng cách b qua các file li. And went back to the old one after about 2 weeksīecause in my experience, the Third version sucks. FastCopy là công c mang li cho bn nhng tin ích tuyt vi vi kh nng tng tc sao chép file d liu lên n 4MB/giây. And with TeraCopy I went from 2.3 to 3.26. I recently went from Windows 7 to Windows 10 and during the transition acquired the newest versions of various software that I use. But on a side note: which versions are you using? I did some speed tests and found TeraCopy was no better than Windows copy, at least for speed. There have been some talk about integrating TC more into FC.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |